Is your investigation process fit for purpose?

A 20-question self-assessment checklist

Most EHS teams know their investigation process has gaps. Few have measured exactly where or how severe. This scored checklist gives you a five-minute diagnostic across reporting quality, speed and efficiency, quality and accuracy, and outcomes. Score yourself. See where you stand.

Reporting quality: five diagnostic statements covering form abandonment, blank fields, declining near-miss data and shift-based reporting gaps
Speed and efficiency: five statements covering queue times, admin-to-analysis ratio, one-size-fits-all processes and manual template population
Quality and accuracy: five statements covering root cause defaults, siloed data, generic corrective actions and investigator variability
Outcomes: five statements covering repeat incidents, overdue corrective actions, audit findings and systemic change

Five minutes from download to a clear picture of where you stand

This checklist is modelled on the existing Ideagen corrective actions assessment. Same layout. Same scoring logic. Designed to be completed by any EHS professional in five minutes. Each scoring band links to a recommended white paper for deeper analysis so you know exactly what to read next.

Download now

“

They are extraordinarily valuable. But there's not very many of them, and there's dozens of sites, hundreds of reporters and potentially thousands of incidents and near misses every year. They can't be everywhere at once. So most reporters are never going to get that expertise when they need it.

Krystal Truax, VP Product Management, Ideagen

Stop treating every incident like it needs the same investigation

Download this white paper for a severity triage framework, a self-assessment worksheet and a step-by-step walkthrough of what AI-assisted investigation should look like at each tier.

Download now